Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs purchased a land of khasra No.454 from defendant No.1-Inder Raj in a sale consideration of Rs.40,000/- and also executed a written agreement to sell dated 04.06.1986. At the time of executing the written agreement to sell, a sum of Rs. 30,000/- were paid towards sale consideration. There was a condition in the agreement to sell that defendant No.1-Inder Raj shall redeem the said land by repaying the bank loan. After that, registry was to be done in favour of the plaintiffs. Defendant No.1-Inder Raj took the balance amount of sale consideration i.e. Rs.10,000/- on 22.06.1986 for repaying the bank loan but he had not executed the registered sale deed in favour of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs served a notice to the defendant No.1 but he had not executed the registered sale deed in favour of the plaintiffs. So, the plaintiffs filed a suit for specific performance of the contract against the defendant No.1. Defendant No.1 filed written statement and stated that he had not executed any written agreement to sell in favour of the plaintiffs. Rather, he had executed written agreement to sell in favour of defendant No.2 Manbhadra on 05.04.1986. The defendant No.1 in his reply also stated that the plaintiffs wrongly mentioned the khasra No.454 in the written agreement
