First appeal against a judgment and decree dated 07.04.2015. Counsel for the appellant stated the decree had been satisfied and the entire decretal amount deposited, so nothing survived. The appeal was dismissed as infructuous and pending miscellaneous applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:11377]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 172/2017
Inder Singh Yadav S/o Late Shri Takhat Singh Yadav, Radha Bhawan, Shyam Gali, Hathi Bhata, Ajmer
----Appellant
Versus
Ummed Mal Jain S/o Shri Panna Lal, Dadda Hawali, Karaka Chowk, Ajmer
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ashish Saxsena For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order
05/03/2024
Learned counsel for appellant submitted that judgment and decree dated 07.04.2015 has been satisfied and the appellant had deposited the entire decretal amount so nothing survives in the matter.
Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for appellant. The appeal is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
Misc. application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J
GAURAV /66
Inder Singh Yadav S/o Late Shri Takhat Singh Yadav
Ummed Mal Jain S/o Shri Panna Lal
Ashok Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
