Single judge dismissed a restoration application and ordered the writ petition to be proceeded further without recording a separate order of restoration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:RJ-JP:14132
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 77/2023
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12600/2011
Versus
----Respondents
(2 of 2) [WRES-77/2023] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Raghav, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
13/07/2023
Heard on the restoration application.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The writ petition is restored to its original number.
Office to proceed further.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Upendra Pratap Singh /15
Goverdhan (Since Died), Through Legal Heirs
Daya Chand Son Of Nathu
Birdhi Lal Son Of Nathu, (Since Died Through Legal Heirs)
The Board Of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer
The Revenue Appellate Authority, Kota
The Additional Collector And Magistrate, Sahabad, District- Baran
INDERJEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
