The High Court allowed a writ miscellaneous application due to miscommunication regarding a recorded compromise fact and restored the petition to its original number.
The application is allowed and the petition as well as the application of the applicants is restored to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Misc Application No. 16/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary a/w Mr. Rajender Katariya. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. A.R. Choudhary, PP. |
| Mr. G.R. Punia, Sr. Counsel assisted | |
| byMr. Rajendra Prasad. |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
04/01/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to miscommunication a wrong fact of compromise was recorded.
(2 of 2) [WMAP-16/2022]
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The petition as well as the application of the applicants is restored to its original number.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
72-nirmala/-
Daulat Multani and others
State of Rajasthan and others
Dr. Justice Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
