The special leave appeal was not pressed by the appellant counsel. The court disposed of the appeal without any liberty granted for filing a representation, merely recording the counsel's submission without a decision or liberty explicitly granted in the order text provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:39385-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 792/2022
Chhitar Mal S/o Ladu Ram, Aged About 45 Years, By Cast Jat, Resident Of Village Udaipura, Tehsil Dataramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.).
----Appellant
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. KL Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit, Dy. S.G.
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
17/11/2023
Learned counsel for the appellant does not want to press the present appeal, but seeks liberty for the appellant to file a representation before the respondents.
Accordingly, the present appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellant to file an appropriate representation before the respondents, which shall be decided by passing a speaking order strictly in accordance with law.
(REKHA BORANA),J
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J
12-/sudheer//-
Chhitar Mal S/o Ladu Ram
Union Of India
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
