Dismissed

State of Rajasthan v. Sonu Sharma D/O Manohar Lal Sharma

Rajasthan HC11 Dec 2023SAW/1166/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dispensed with a detailed analysis of the petitions. Counsel for both sides accepted that the respondents failed the physical efficiency test, rendering the impugned order complied with. Consequently, the special appeal writs were dismissed without exhaustive reasoning.

What did the court decide?

Special appeal writs dismissed; pending applications disposed of.

State of Rajasthan Vs Sonu Sharma D/O Manohar Lal… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:49874-DB]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1212/2022

¶4

¶5

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13954/2019

¶6

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶7

Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶8

Inspector General Of Police (Recruitment), Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶9

Dy. Commissionerate Of Police (Head Quarter), Police Commissionrate, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶10

----Appellants

¶11

Versus

¶12

Kavita Kumari D/o Shri Mahesh Kumar, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Solana, Tehsil Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.).

¶13

Pooja Biroliya D/o Shri Jagdish Prasad, Wife Of Shri Kailash Chand, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Mkb401, Jagatpura, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.).

¶14

Rekha Kanwar D/o Shri Durjan Singh, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Asalwas, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.).

¶15

Raju Devi D/o Shri Kistur Ram, W/o Shri Om Prakash Kasaniyan, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Village Sathana Khurd, Tehsil Riyad Badi, District Nagaur (Raj.).

¶16

Kamla Yadav D/o Shri Mangal Chand Yadav, Wife Of Shri Sunil Kumar, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Dagro Ki Dhani, Nathi Ka Bas, Sanwvt Ka Bas, Rainwal Phulera, District Jaipur (Raj.).

¶17

----Respondents

¶18

Connected With

¶19

D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1162/2022

¶20

¶21

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2590/2022

¶22

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Home

¶23

(2 of 3)

¶24

[2025:RJ-JP:49874-DB]

¶25

[SAW-1212/2022]

¶26

Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶27

Inspector General Of Police, Bharatpur Range Bharatpur (Raj.).

¶28

Director General Of Police, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶29

Addl. Director General Of Police (Appointment And Promotion Board), Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶30

The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer (Raj.).

¶31

----Appellants

¶32

Versus

¶33

Radhika Singh D/o Shri Ranjeet Singh, Wife Of Shri Jitendra Singh, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of 41 Moti Vihar, Near Neelam Paradise Hotel, Sirsi Road, Panchyawala, District Jaipur (Raj.).

¶34

----Respondent

¶35

D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1164/2022

¶36

¶37

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2710/2022

¶38

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶39

Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarters, Near Nehru Place, Tonk Road, Jaipur.

¶40

Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ajmer.

¶41

----Appellants

¶42

Versus

¶43

Smt. Rajesh Janu D/o Shri Birma Ram Janu, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ward No. 06, Village Seetsar, Tehsil Ratangarh, District Churu, Rajasthan.

¶44

----Respondent

¶45

For Appellant(s)	:	Mr. Samee Khan with
		Ms. Epsa Nangalia
		Mr. Aakash Mewara for
		Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma,AAG
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Sanjay Mehla with Ms. Sunita Mehla

¶46

(3 of 3)

¶47

[2025:RJ-JP:49874-DB]

¶48

[SAW-1212/2022]

¶49

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL

¶50

Order

¶51

08/12/2025

¶52

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that since, in physical efficiency test, the respondents have failed, the order impugned stands complied with.

¶53

Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the aforesaid statement.

¶54

In view thereof, these special appeal writs are dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.

¶55

(BHUWAN GOYAL),J

¶56

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

¶57

Tahir. Gourav. 129-131

State of Rajasthan v. Sonu Sharma D/O Manohar Lal Sharma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State of Rajasthan v. Sonu Sharma D/O Manohar Lal Sharma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Singh Meena S/O Sh. Ram Karan Meena Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

M/S Preeti Lce Cream and Foods Vs Commissioner Taxes Officer Andanr

Muskan Khandelwal D/O Dinesh Khandelwal Vs Union of India

Bhagwan Dass Agarwal S/O Late Shri Ram Charan Lal Agarwal Vs State of Rajasthan through Its Principal Law Secretary

Rajender Kumar Maan S/O Roora Ram Maan Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Shanti Devi W/O Shri Goverdhan Lal Kumawat Vs Collector (Stamps)