Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant had no representation even in the second round; note of potential dismissal for lack of prosecution was issued.
Dismissal of appeal for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/010145]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 54/2020
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - III, NCR Building Statue Circle, C-Scheme, Jaipur - 302005 (Raj.)
----Appellant
Versus
Lalit Kumar Biyani, Prop. City Boy, Tabela Road, Sikar Pan No. ACAPB2310E
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : None
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Judgment / Order
10/05/2023
None has appeared on behalf of the appellant even in the second round.
On the last date of hearing, it was clearly stated that adjournment is being granted as a last indulgence and if the case is not argued on the next date, the Court may proceed to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
As there is no one to prosecute the appeal, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
Mohita /63
Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - III, NCR Building Statue Circle, C-Scheme, Jaipur
Lalit Kumar Biyani, Prop. City Boy
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
