The Acting Chief Justice dismissed this PIL filed by a petitioner, holding it misconceived as it sought to direct a tribunal to decide a pending appeal where the petitioner was not a party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/010096]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D. B. Civil (PIL) Writ Petition No. 7286/2023
Madhu W/o Arjun Singh, aged about 32 years, R/o Village and Gram Panchayat Behnera, Tehsil and District Bharatpur at Present Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Bahnera, Panchayat Samiti Sewar, District Bharatpur Mobile No. 9649412721
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Bhardwaj Advocate.
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order
10/05/2023
In the garb of PIL, the petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction for decision of a pending appeal before the Appellate Tribunal where the petitioner is not a party.
Though argument has been raised that certain directions have been issued in the matter, at the instance of the
[2023/RJJP/010096]
[CW-7286/2023]
(2 of 2)
petitioner, no direction can be issued for deciding pending case before a Tribunal or a Court.
This PIL is misconceived and, therefore, the same is dismissed.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
MANOJ NARWANI /11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition can direct a tribunal to decide a pending appeal in which the petitioner is not a party.
Madhu W/o Arjun Singh
The State of Rajasthan
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
