In a habeas corpus petition alleging illegal custody of the petitioner's wife by Respondent No.4, the Single Bench held that allegations were false, no case was made out, and the petition was dismissed based on factual reports from the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/010976]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 85/2023
Pal Singh S/o Sh. Dhanna Ram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Old Ward No. 5, New 8, Behind Hari Ram Mandir, Balmiki Mohalla, Tehsil Pilibanga, District Hanumangarh (Raj.).
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Tirupati Chandra. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. M.A. Siddiqui, GA cum AAG. |
| Ms. Rajandeep Kaur, SI, P.S. | |
| Pilibanga,Hanumangarh. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
Order
20/04/2023
[2023/RJJD/010976]
[HC-85/2023]
(2 of 2)
namely Sunita Devi and the allegation made against respondent No.4 were factually incorrect and apparently were made on account of inter-se dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.4 in relation to some outstanding.
As none was present for the petitioner, the matter was adjourned.
(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
3-pradeep/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner establishes that his wife is in illegal custody warranting habeas corpus relief.
Pal Singh S/o Sh. Dhanna Ram
State Of Rajasthan
Sibo Bai W/o Pal Singh
Lakhveer Singh S/o Uttam Singh
Arun Bhansali
Rajendra Prakash Soni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
