A habeas corpus petition filed by the petitioner seeking the production of his son was dismissed. The court noted that the individual, referred to as corpus, had been dropped at the petitioner's residence, meaning no illegal detention was established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:14966-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 243/2023
Mahesh Chand Sharma S/o Shri Ram Dayal Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Ward No. 11 Kajodi Ka Moholla, Kherli, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Bhardwaj For State : Mr. Imran Khan, Dy. G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order
21/07/2023
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
AMIT/49
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the habeas corpus petition seeking production of the petitioner's son should be entertained given that the corpus has already been dropped at his residence.
Mahesh Chand Sharma
State of Rajasthan
Lakahn Singh
Pankaj Bhandari
Bhuwan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
