Single Judge Bench dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed for the production of a female companion (corpus) who was living with her husband in a married relationship under a protection order, holding she was not in illegal detention.
Habeas corpus petition and stay application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:14199-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 177/2023
Suresh Choudhary Son Of Jhuta Ram Choudhary, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Badwo Ka Baas, Vatika, Jaipur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitesh Kumawat For State : Mr. N.S. Gurjar, Asstt. Govt. Adv.
Ms. Manju Kumari, S.I., Police Station Karni Vihar, Jaipur (West), present-inperson.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
14/07/2023
[2023:RJ-JP:14199-DB]
[HC-177/2023]
(2 of 2)
Commissioner of Police, Jaipur (West) and S.H.O. Police Station Karni Vihar, Jaipur (Raj.).
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
AMIT/1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the corpus is in illegal detention justifying the quashing of a habeas corpus petition.
Whether the present habeas corpus petition requires to be entertained given the corressidential relationship and protection order.
Suresh Choudhary
State Of Rajasthan
Lokesh Kumawat
Bhuvan Goyal
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
