This short order in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 94/2019 quashed the proceeding and directed respondents to decide the petitioner's representation by a speaking order within three months, referencing Mukut Bihari Mathur.
Direction to respondents to consider and decide petitioner's representation by a speaking order within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/002058]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 94/2019
Raj Kumar S/o Late Shri Khushi Ram Ji, Aged About 60 Years, By Caste Brahmin, Junior Accountant (Retired) Resident Of House No. - R.c. - 16, Ridhi Sidhi - 2, Tehsil And District Sriganganagar (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himmat Jagga For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.G. Ojha
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
24/01/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if his representation is considered and decided by the respondents, while keeping into consideration the order dated 13.05.2016 passed by a coordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Jaipur Bench in Mukut Bihari Mathur Vs. Rajasthan State Agricultural Marketing Board, & Ors.; S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6156/2016).
(2 of 2)
[2023/RJJD/002058]
[CW-94/2019]
In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, while keeping into consideration the order passed in Mukut Bihari Mathur (supra) by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from today, strictly in accordance with law. All pending applications stand disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
95-Zeeshan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's representation considered by respondents in accordance with coordinate order dated 13.05.2016.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mukut Bihari Mathur Vs. Rajasthan State Agricultural Marketing Board, & Ors.Explained¶16
_Mukut Bihari Mathur Vs. Rajasthan State Agricultural Marketing Board, & Ors.; S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6156/2016)
Raj Kumar
The Rajasthan State Agriculture, Marketing Board Through Its Administrator/general Manager
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
