Quashed

Rakesh Kumar Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC24 Jan 2023CW/1323/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of two writ petitions challenging transfer orders dated 16.06.2018. Considering a four-year lapse since an interim order preventing the petitioner's relief, the impugned orders were quashed, allowing fresh transfers.

What did the court decide?

Impugned transfer/order dated 16.06.2018 is quashed. Respondents are free to pass fresh transfer order in accordance with law.

Rakesh Kumar Meena Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2023)

(1 of 3)

[2023/RJJD/002417]

[CW-1319/2019]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶5

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1319/2019

¶6

Narayanlal Bhagora S/o Shri Kanaji Bhagora, Aged About 42 Years, By Caste Bheel R/o Village Kadiyanala, Tehsil Kherwara District Udaipur, Presently Working As Primary Teacher, Government Primary School, Amlipada, Tehsil Kherwara, District Udaipur (Rajasthan).

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶10

District Education Officer (Secondary-I), Udaipur (Raj.).

¶11

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Udaipur.

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

Connected With

¶14

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1323/2019

¶15

Rakesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Dharmaji, Aged About 40 Years, By Caste Meena R/o Village Dhandi Obari, Tehsil Kherwara, District Udaipur, Presently Working As Primary Teacher, Government Primary School, Talhati (Pogra), Tehsil Kherwara District Udaipur (Rajasthan).

¶16

----Petitioner

¶17

Versus

¶18

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶19

District Education Officer (Secondary-I), Udaipur (Raj.). 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Udaipur.

¶20

----Respondents

¶21

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Moti Singh.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vishal Jangid,Dy. GC.

¶22

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

24/01/2023

(2 of 3)

[2023/RJJD/002417]

[CW-1319/2019]

In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1319/2019:-

¶29

By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the transfer orders dated 16.06.2018.

¶30

This Court after hearing learned counsel for the parties had passed the interim order on 29.01.2019 whereby it was directed that the petitioner shall not be relieved from the present place of posting. Since in the present case, the transfer/ posting of the petitioner is involved and the petitioner has remained on the similar place, in view of the interim order passed by this Court and a period of four years have passed, therefore, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms that the absorption/transfer impugned order dated 16.06.2018 qua the petitioner is quashed and the respondents will be free to pass a fresh transfer order in accordance with law considering the administrative exigencies. All pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶31

In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1323/2019:-

¶32

By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the transfer orders dated 16.06.2018.

(3 of 3)

[2023/RJJD/002417]

[CW-1319/2019]

accordance with law considering the administrative exigencies. All pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶38

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

¶39

312-313-Jitender

Rakesh Kumar Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Kumar Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Malik Vs Ramavtar Meena and Anr.

Savita Rathore Vs State of Rajasthan

Sheetal Ameta Vs the State of Rajasthan

Raj Kumar Vs the Rajasthan State Agriculture

Rahul Bamaniya Vs State of Rajasthan

Jethmal Vs Pradeep Malviya