Allowed

Charan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Apr 2023CW/926/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged their representation denial in education. The High Court disposed of the writ petition directing respondents to consider Annexure-11 and decide the representation strictly in accordance with law.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to consider and decide the petitioners' representation in accordance with law while keeping into consideration Annexure-11.

Charan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Education and Admissions | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJD/009512]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 926/2023

¶4

Charan Singh S/o Shri Mota Ram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Kadanadi, Tehsil Sindhari, District Barmer.

¶5

Chunnilal S/o Shri Jodharm, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Kadanadi, Tehsil Sindhari, District Barmer.

¶6

Bharuram S/o Shri Mota Ram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Kadanadi, Tehsil Sindhari, District Barmer.

¶7

Mula Ram S/o Shri Bhikharam, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Kadanadi, Tehsil Sindhari, District Barmer.

¶8

Ravtaram S/o Shri Kishna Ram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Kadanadi, Tehsil Sindhari, District Barmer.

¶9

Jog Raj Potaliya S/o Tika Ram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Nadi, Panyl Kallan, District Barmer.

¶10

Om Prakash S/o Dalu Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Kadanadi, Tehsil Sindhari, District Barmer.

¶11

----Petitioners

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶14

Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 3. Chief District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Barmer.

¶15

Chief District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Hanumangarh.

¶16

Sub Divisional Officer, Sindhari, District Barmer. 6. Sandeep Saharan, At Present Posted As Senior Teacher Subject English, Government Senior Secondary School, Mainawali, Hanumangarh Its Through Chief District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Barmer.

¶17

----Respondents

¶18

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Dev Patolia.

¶19

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

(2 of 2)

[2023/RJJD/009512]

[CW-926/2023]

12/04/2023

Learned counsel for the petitioners at the outset makes a limited submission that the respondents may be directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners, while taking into consideration Annexure-11.

¶26

In light of such limited submission, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners, while keeping into consideration the Annexure-11, strictly in accordance with law.

¶27

Stay Petition also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶28

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

¶29

112-Jitender

Charan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Charan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balaji Trading Granites Vs State of Rajasthan

M/S. R R Godara Construction Company Vs State of Rajasthan

Lrs of Laxman Ram Vs Babli

Narendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Narayan Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul Vs the State of Rajasthan