Allowed
Urmila Choudhary v. the State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan HCCW/88/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This order disposed of multiple connected writ petitions challenging transfer orders of education department employees. The court held that expediency for transfers ceased due to the passage of time and changed circumstances, making the interim order absolute and restraining the impugned transfers, while reserving the right to challenge subsequent orders.
What did the court decide?
Impugned transfer orders shall not be given effect to; interim order made absolute; right to challenge subsequent orders reserved.