Single judge of Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur allowed a writ petition by relying on the recent judgment in Sunita Kalwa, without detailed reasoning as the issue was squarely covered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:35128]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16141/2023
Chetana D/o Jaichand, W/o Ravi Jain, Aged About 39 Years, R/o H. No. 121 Nagada Nohra Gali, Salumber, Udaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Sushil Bishnoi |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Vinit Sanadhya |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
13/10/2023
Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by a judgment of this Court rendered in S.B Civil Writ Petition No.2555/2023 (Sunita Kalwa & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.) decided on 10.04.2023.
For the self same reasons, the present writ petition is also allowed in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Sunita Kalwa (supra).
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
270-Shahenshah/-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sunita Kalwa & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.Relied on¶17
S.B Civil Writ Petition No.2555/2023 (Sunita Kalwa & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.)
Chetana D/o Jaichand
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department
Principal Secretary, Education Department
The Director, Elementary Education Rajasthan
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Vinit Kumar Mathur
Parties & counsel
