The writ petition stood dismissed for want of prosecution as counsel for the petitioner submitted having no instructions in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:RJ-JP:13359
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8316/2022
Ramgopal Khinchi Son Of Late Shri Ramprasad Khinchi, Resident Of House No. 505, Mandi Khatikan, Near Dinesh Floor Mill, Char Darwaja, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
Nitin Kumar Modani Son Of Naveen Kumar Modani, Resident Of House No. 1571, Modani Bhawan, Jat Ke Kue Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. O.P. Mishra For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
05/07/2023
Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions in this matter.
In that view of the matter, the present writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Upendra Pratap Singh /4
Ramgopal Khinchi
Nitin Kumar Modani
INDERJEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
