This order holds that the subject controversy is covered by a connected writ petition disposed with specific directions regarding salary corrections and merit lists. The court disposes of the instant petition in terms of that judgment without analyzing merits.
Disposed in terms of the judgment passed in DB Civil Writ Petition No.7564/2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:35819-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR.
…
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7729/2023.
Pritosh Gehlot S/o Sh. Chhagni Ram, aged about 27 years, B/c Mali, R/o Mata Ka Than, Basni Tamboliya Road, Punjala, Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Pran Joshi. |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Chayan Bothra. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
Order
18/10/2023
(2 of 4)
[2023:RJ-JD:35819-DB]
[CW-7729/2023]
“9.29 Consequently, all these petitions are disposed off with following directions:
(A) Respondents shall undertake an exercise of revision of category wise list by including in the Open/General category list, those candidates of reserve category, who have secured more marks in the written examination provided they have not taken or availed of any special benefit which may dis-entitle them from being considered against Open/General category post.
(B) After drawing the Open/General category list,the list of respective reserve category shall be drawn up.
(C) If, as a result of aforesaid exercise, it is found that the petitioners herein have been accommodated either in the Open/General category list or there respective reserve category list then:
(i) If they have already been allowed to provisionally appear in the Typewriting Test on Computer, subject to they having secured minimum qualifying marks in Typewriting Test, their aggregate marks obtained in the written examination and Typewriting Test shall be drawn up.
(3 of 4)
[2023:RJ-JD:35819-DB]
[CW-7729/2023]
(ii) Those, who have not been allowed to provisionally appear in the Typewriting Test, they will be entitled to appear in the Typewriting Test and for this purpose, the respondents shall hold Typewriting Test on Computer for such candidates, subject to they having obtained minimum qualifying marks in the Typewriting Test, their aggregate marks obtained in written examination and Typewriting Test shall also be drawn up.
(D) The merit list in the Open/General category and the respective reserve category shall be reworked. If the petitioners herein are included either in the Open/General category list on the basis of their merit, they shall be offered appointment against posts in General/Open category, subject to the condition that they are fulfilling all other requirements. Similarly, those petitioners, who have been able to secure a place in the merit list of their respective reserve category would be offered appointment against posts in their respective reserved category, subject to fulfilling all other conditions.
(E) It goes without saying that while undertaking revision of the list, provisions contained in (i) to (v) under Section B of Clause 15 of the advertisement shall have to be followed .
(F) If no vacant posts are available, less meritorious candidates, who have been appointed in Open category or reserve category, as the case may be, are required to be terminated.
(4 of 4)
[2023:RJ-JD:35819-DB]
[CW-7729/2023]
9.30 Aforesaid directions are being issued as the appointments were not made till the date of conclusion of hearing.”
(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
S/183-Mohan/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the controversy is covered by the decision in DB Civil Writ Petition No.7564/2023.
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of in terms of that judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rajat Yadav v. Rajasthan High Court & Ors.Relied on¶15
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7564/2023 (Rajat Yadav vs. Rajasthan High Court & Ors.)
Pritosh Gehlot
Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur Through Registrar General
The Registrar (Examination), Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur
Vijay Bishnoi
Rajendra Prakash Soni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
