The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous since the petitioners had been given promotion during the pendency, removing the cause for grievance.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; stay application and pending applications dismissed; liberty to move application for revival if grievance subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RNASTHAN BENCH AT JAEPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 729212007
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Virendra Lodha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jai Lodha Mr. V.P. Mathur Mr. P.C. Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
18/08/2023
None present for the petitioners.
At the outset, counsel for the respondents apprised thi'3 Court that during pendency of this petition, the petitioners have been given promotion, hence, under the changed circumstances, this petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as rendered infructuous.
Stay application and all application(s) (pending, if any) also stand dismissed.
However, the petitioners would be at liberty to move an application for revival of this petition if any cause d actionigrievance still subsists or survives.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
MRI90
K.L Ninania
Badri Lal Meena
Rajasthan Housing Board
Hansraj Dupga
Ram Chandra Meghwal
Pyarelal
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
