review and revision category and a separate list was prepared. He further submits that since the cases of the petitioners for promotion were considered by the DPC under review and revision category, therefore, they are not required to be given promotion for the year 2016-2017. The respondents were well within their right to consider the cases of the petitioners for promotion on substantive basis in the subsequent years. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners were promoted in consonance with Rule 24 Sub-clause-3 of the Rules. He further submits that the respondents were well within their right to pass the order dated 09.07.2018 (Annex.7) without issuing any show cause notice as the petitioners were promoted only on officiating basis and since their cases for promotion on substantive basis were considered by a regular DPC subsequently, they were rightly promoted on the post of School Lecturer on substantive basis against the vacancies for the year 2018-19 and for subsequent year. Learned counsel further submits that while following the procedure for promoting the candidates, the eligibility list of the candidates on provisional and regular basis was not taken into consideration and, therefore, the petitioners have no right to be promoted from the year 20162017. He, therefore, prays that no pre decisional hearing is warranted in such cases and the writ petitions are, therefore, prayed to be dismissed.
