Nirmal Kumar Jain and Ors. v. State of Raj and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners seeking relief based on efflux of time. Court held petition infructuous due to lapse of time and dismissed it along with pending applications.
Petitioners seeking relief based on efflux of time. Court held petition infructuous due to lapse of time and dismissed it along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 622712004
----Petitioner
Versus
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Virendra Lodha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rachit Sharma For Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
06/09/2023
Counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as rendered infructuous. All applications (pending, if any) also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),]
Nirmal Kumar Jain
State of Rajasthan
Union of India
Union Public Service Commission
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court