Mohammed Safi v. Rsrtc Jaipur and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition filed in 2000 was dismissed by the High Court for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent and showed no interest in proceeding with the matter.
The writ petition filed in 2000 was dismissed by the High Court for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent and showed no interest in proceeding with the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5436/2000
Mohammed Safi s/o Shri Nabi Bux, 1567,luharon Ka Khura,ahiron Ki Imali,chokari Ghatgate,jaipurraj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.L. Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
06/09/2023
This petition is pending before this Court since 2000. On 16.08.2023 the counsel for the petitioner pleaded no instructions on behalf of the petitioner. In the interest of justice, this Court issued Court notices to the petitioner to engage some other counsel. In pursuance of the said order passed by this Court notices were issued to the petitioner but the same has been received with the report o process server that the petitioner is not residing at the address mentioned in the memo of writ petition.
It appears that the petitioner is no interested in prosecuting this matter.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.
[CW-5436/2000]
(2 of 2)
However, the petitioner would be at liberty to submit application for revival of this petition in case he feels that any cause of action / grievance still survives.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
KuD/7
Mohammed Safi
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court