Disposed

Sandeep Kumar Sharma v. the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Rajasthan HC2 Jan 2023CW/5837/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge order disposed of a Civil Writ Petition. The Court directed the respondents to file a fresh representation by the petitioners' representation dated 21.03.2022. The competent authority was ordered to consider the application within three months to ensure expeditious redressal.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to consider the petitioners' representation dated 21.03.2022 within three months and a stay application disposed of.

Sandeep Kumar Sharma Vs the Rajasthan State Road… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5837/2022

¶3

Sandeep Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Ramesh Chandra Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Gamudwali, Tehsil Padampur, District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.

¶4

Ravi Prasad S/o Shri Jeetaram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Mohalla Khuja, Hanumangarh Junction, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.

¶5

Harman Singh S/o Shri Shivcharan, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Chak 2 K K W (Nava), Tehsil And District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.

¶6

Sandeep Kumar S/o Shri Madan Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Pakka Saran, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.

¶7

Bakshish Singh S/o Shri Shrawan Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Ward No. 12, Bhatta Colony, Hanumangarh Junction, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.

¶8

Ram Chandra Choudhary S/o Shri Ladu Ram, Aged About 44 Years, R/o New Civil Line, Hanumangarh Junction, Ward No. 01, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.

¶9

----Petitioners

¶10

Versus

¶11

1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Managing Director, Hq Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶12

1. The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Saurabh Soni
For Respondent(s)	:

¶15

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶16

Order

¶17

02/01/2023

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners would be satisfied if the Managing Director/competent authority of

¶19

(2 of 2) [CW-5837/2022]

¶20

the respondent – Corporation is directed to consider petitioners’ representation dated 21.03.2022 expeditiously.

¶21

The petition is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file a fresh representation along with the photo copy of the representation dated 21.03.2022 and certified copy of the order instant within a period of four weeks from today.

¶22

In case any such representation is addressed, the competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months of receiving the same.

¶23

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the petitioners’ representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioners’ grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

¶24

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶25

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶26

22-Arvind/-

Sandeep Kumar Sharma v. the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Kumar Sharma v. the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Giriraj Gujrati Vs State of Rajasthan

Shokin Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhanu Pratap Vs State of Rajasthan

Giriraj Chayal Vs Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur

Kailash Chandra Meghwal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Deepak Tak Vs State of Rajasthan