Petitioner challenged the legality of a tender notice and work done. Upon submission that the petitioner could complete the remaining work at the agreed rate, the petition was disposed of.
Respondents directed to abide by assurance to reconsider granting work to petitioner for completion within four months at same rate; parties to cooperate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:36175]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5708/2023
M/s Rampal Sharma, Through Its Proprietor Rampal S/o Shri Bheru Lal, Age 38 About Years, R/o 7-D-14 Bapu Nagar Bhilwara (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Bachhawat
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
19/10/2023
(2 of 2)
[2023:RJ-JD:36175]
[CW-5708/2023]
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
c1-12-Sudheer/-
M/s Rampal Sharma
The State Of Rajasthan
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
