Disposed

Lrs of Shri Kawa v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Oct 2023CW/5618/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought consideration for her pay scale claim based on prior Court judgment. Court disposed of Writ Petition directing respondents to consider petitioner's representation within eight weeks without binding manner of decision.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file representation on pay scale within two weeks; competent authority to consider it within eight weeks.

Lrs of Shri Kawa Vs State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:33993]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5618/2022

¶4

Lrs Of Shri Kawa, S/o Late Vela Ji, Through his Legal Representative:1. Smt. Ganga Devi W/o Late Shri Kawa, Aged 70 years, R/o Village Mandwa (Khaparda), Tehsil Mandwa, District Dungarpur.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Public Health And Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶8

The Chief Engineer (Admn.), Public Health And Engineering Department, Jaipur.

¶9

The Superintending Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, District Circle, Dungarpur.

¶10

The Executive Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Department, City Division, Dungarpur.

¶11

Assistant Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Department, City Sub Division Dungarpur, Dist. Dungarpur.

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Shailendra Kumar
For Respondent(s)	: Ms. Anjana Jawa

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶15

Order

¶16

09/10/2023

¶17

After arguing for some time, Mr. Shailendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the respondents are directed to consider her representations, which she would be filing (within a period of 15 days from today) in the light of judgment rendered by this Court

[2023:RJ-JD:33993]

[CW-5618/2022]

(2 of 2)

in Sohan Lal Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3631/2008), decided on 17.11.2008, which has subsequently been confirmed up till the Hon’ble Apex Court in SLP No.14932/2012.

¶22

The writ petitions is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file representation indicating her pay scale which she claim along with a copy of the judgment dated 17.11.2018 rendered in the case of Sohan Lal Mathur (supra) and a certified copy of the order instant within a period of two weeks from today. 3. If such representation is so addressed, the competent authority shall consider the same and do the needful in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks thereafter.

¶23

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the petitioner’s representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner’s grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

¶24

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶25

145-Shahenshah/-

Lrs of Shri Kawa v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lrs of Shri Kawa v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Sanju Vs State of Rajasthan

Prakash Kumar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Babu Lal Kadela Vs State of Rajasthan

Beena Shekhawat Vs State of Rajasthan

Pawan Kumar Vs the Hanumangarh Central Cooperative Bank Limited

Bhavesh Patidar Vs State of Rajasthan