The High Court dismissed two connected writ petitions for concealment of the fact that petitioners had previously approached the Consumer Court and withdrawn the matter, finding they did not come with clean hands to seek this relief.
Writ petitions dismissed; cost of Rs.50,000/ imposed but subsequently waived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:34234]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5192/2023
Jubaida S/o Nijamdin, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Mangaliyon Ki Dhani, Village Bhagu Ka Gaon, Tehsil And District Jaisalmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5217/2023
Mohammad Insaf S/o Saidad Khan, Aged About 21 Years, Bambro Ki Dhani, Village Bhagu Ka Gaon, Tehsil And District Jaisalmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Manas Ranchhor Khatri |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Rajesh Parihar,AGC |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
10/10/2023
(2 of 2)
[2023:RJ-JD:34234]
[CW-5192/2023]
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
182-183 Zeeshan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether concealment of seeking a remedy from Consumer Court disentitles the petitioners to relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Jubaida S/o Nijamdin
Mohammad Insaf S/o Saidad Khan
The State Of Rajasthan
Municipal Council, Jaisalmer
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
