The High Court disposed of the writ petition by relying on an earlier order dated 14.03.2022 in SBCWP No.1964/2022 (Zabir Khan & Ors.), applying it mutatis mutandis barring direction No.1 due to the amnesty scheme no longer being in force.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/005062]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5022/2023
Harun S/o Aasu, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village Lewra Tehsil Kaman District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Owner Of Articulated Vehicle Registration No. Rj-05 Gb-5833.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.K. Sharma. For Respondent(s) : Dr. Ganesh Parihar, AAG.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
28/03/2023
Learned counsels for the respective parties submit that the issue involved herein is no more res integra and stands resolved by an order of this Court dated 14.03.2022 in SBCWP No.1964/2022: Zabir Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and other connected matters. They submit that the writ petition may also be disposed of in similar terms barring the direction No.1 inasmuch as the amnesty scheme is no more in force. Taking into consideration the contentions advanced by learned counsels for
[2023/RJJP/005062]
[CW-5022/2023]
(2 of 2)
the respective parties and the material on record, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of order dated 14.03.2022 passed in case of Zabir Khan (supra) which shall apply mutatis mutandis to this case also barring the direction No.1.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
MG/112
Harun S/o Aasu
State Of Rajasthan
Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan
Regional Transport Officer, Bharatpur
Regional Transport Officer, Sikar
District Transport Officer, Bhiwadi
Inderjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
