Disposed

Ram Singh Constable (Driver) No. 1003 (Retd) v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC11 Jan 2023CW/500/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge order in a writ petition by a retired constable directs the State respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's representation regarding pension/retirement within three months from the date of receipt, relying on a coordinate bench decision.

What did the court decide?

Direction to State respondents to consider petitioner's representation and pass reasoned order within three months.

Ram Singh Constable (Driver) No. 1003… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 500/2023

¶3

Ram Singh Constable (Driver) No. 1003 (Retd) S/o Shri Amar Singh, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Vidhya Colony, Kota Road, Baran.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance (Rules), Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

The Dgp, Rajasthan Police, Phq Rajasthan Police, Lal Kothi, Jaipur.

¶8

The Superintendent Of Police, Baran, Rajasthan.

¶9

----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harshvardhan Singh For Respondent(s) :

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order

¶11

11/01/2023

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the controversy raised in the instant writ petition stands resolved in view of the adjudication made by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Kuldeep Singh & Ors. Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S. B. Civil Writ Petition No.3926/2013) decided on 26.04.2013.

¶13

It is further contended that for the present; the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a time frame, in the backdrop of the adjudication in the case of

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CW-500/2023]

¶16

Kuldeep Singh & Ors. (supra), which he is ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.

¶17

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation before the respondents enclosing a copy of the order in the case of Kuldeep Singh & Ors. (supra).

¶18

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law, however, in no case later than three months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶19

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶20

The stay application also stands disposed of.

¶21

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶22

101-Praveen/-

Ram Singh Constable (Driver) No. 1003 (Retd) v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Singh Constable (Driver) No. 1003 (Retd) v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahipal Jain Vs Shri Ajitabh Sharma (Ias)

Jitendra Singh Vs Shri Manju Rajpal

Meenakshi Choubisa Vs Naveen Mahajan and Ors.

Raghuveer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukeshee Vs State of Rajasthan

Jitendra Sharma Vs the State of Rajasthan