In a writ petition regarding the regularization of the petitioner's services, the Hon'ble Court held that the issue was squarely covered by a previous judgment in Jitendra Kumar Tailor and disposed of the case with similar directions.
Disposed with directions to the State Government to decide the matter for regularization of services within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/014537]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4350/2023
Abhishek Godara S/o Shri Surendra Godara, Aged About 27 Years, R/o.Ward No.4, 43 Mmk (Morjandakhari) Ganganagar Dist Sri Ganganagar (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devkinandan Vyas For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Parihar
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
10/05/2023
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is squarely covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1952/2019, decided on 06.07.2020, which in turn had relied on order in the case of Roshan Lal Saini v. State & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18056/2015, decided on 09.03.2017.
In the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra), a Co-ordinate
Bench of this Court inter alia directed as under:
“In this view of the matter, I deem it just and
appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a
(2 of 2)
[2023/RJJD/014537]
[CW-4350/2023]
direction to the State Govt. to decide the matter at the earliest to facilitate issuance of requisite order of regularization of petitioner’s services, strictly in accordance with law. The requisite exercise be undertaken by the State Govt. at the earliest, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date presentation of this order.”
Learned counsel for the respondents, is not in a position to dispute the fact that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).
In view of the above fact situation, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of, in light of and with similar directions as given in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
126-SanjayS/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding regularization of services is covered by the decision in Jitendra Kumar Tailor.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jitendra Kumar Tailor v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.Followed¶15
Jitendra Kumar Tailor v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1952/2019
Roshan Lal Saini v. State & Ors.Relied on¶15
Roshan Lal Saini v. State & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18056/2015
Abhishek Godara
The State Of Rajasthan
Director, Local Self Government
Municipal Council Sri Ganganagar
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
