The High Court at Jodhpur held that the writ petition had become infructuous. The petition is dismissed, and all pending applications are disposed of.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; all pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJD/015874]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4246/2022
Vimla Devi W/o Ramniwas, Aged About 42 Years, By Caste Rajput,r/o Jindrasar, Sujangarh, District Churu.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishabh Handa For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. (through VC) assisted by Mr. K.S. Lodha
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
18/05/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this writ petition has become infructuous.
Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. All pending applications stand disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
142-Zeeshan
Vimla Devi W/o Ramniwas
State Of Rajasthan
Puspendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
