Allowed

Purushottam Narayan Rao v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Jan 2023CW/414/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Single Judge disposed of the writ petition following the directions of a Division Bench judgment by granting the petitioners one month to submit representations for benefit consideration, noting a stay petition was also disposed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of by permitting the Government to consider representations submitted or filed within one month.

Purushottam Narayan Rao Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 414/2023

¶3

Purushottam Narayan Rao S/o Shri Jagdish Narayan Rao, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of 91 - D, Shiv Shakti Vihar, Opposite Benarl Railway Station Boytawala, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶4

Shyam Sunder Sharma S/o Shri Roshan Lal Sharma, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of 18, Opposite E-168, Meena Krishi Farm, Murlipura Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶5

Satyendra Kumar Nama S/o Shri Bajrang Lal Nama, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of 251, Behind Rseb, Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶9

The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Hans RajNimbar
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Vishal Jangid

¶12

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶13

Order

¶14

10/01/2023

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in similar circumstances and similar matters, the Division Bench of this Court in The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner Vs. Narendra Kumar Boolchandani & Ors.; D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.362/2020 along with connected matters, while considering the aspect that the issue in question has arisen in large number of cases and the Government has accepted the stand and granted

¶16

(2 of 3)

¶17

[CW-414/2023]

¶18

the benefits, disposed of the appeals with the following directions:-

¶19

“Learned counsel for the petitioners, however, submitted that the issue is arising in large number of cases and in several departments, the Government has accepted the stand and granted the benefits. If the petitioners are not granted similar benefits, it would amount to discriminatory treatment. Whatever be the grievance of the petitioners they can be resolved at the level of the administration or by the Court through bipartite hearing.

¶20

In view of the peculiar circumstances, these appeals are disposed of by permitting the Government to take into account the representations already made or to be filed by any of the petitioners within one month. In the process, the authorities will bear in mind the stand taken by the department in similar cases. Such representations would be decided in accordance with law unmindful of the observations and directions issued by the learned Single Judge in the impugned orders. Eventually, if the grievances of the petitioner still survive after the Government decision, it is open for the petitioners to seeks redressal thereafter in accordance with law.”

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present writ petition of the petitioners may also be disposed of in light of the above mentioned judgment.

¶22

Learned counsel for the respondents also agrees to the said submission.

¶23

(3 of 3) [CW-414/2023]

¶24

In view of the submissions made, the present writ petition is disposed of with the same directions as issued by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Narendra Kumar Boolchandani (supra).

¶25

The stay petition also stands disposed of.

¶26

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶27

181-akansha/-

Purushottam Narayan Rao v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Purushottam Narayan Rao v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Kumar Bhati Vs the State of Rajasthan

Shweta Middha Vs State of Rajasthan

Khurshed Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Raman Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Sheetal Nagar Vs State of Rajasthan

Praveen Godara Vs State of Rajasthan