Disposed

Shweta Middha v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Jan 2023CW/312/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking direction to post the petitioner with her husband in government service. The court directed respondents to sympathetically consider her representation and decided matters within three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to sympathetically consider the petitioner's representation based on state policy and decide it within three weeks with a speaking order.

Shweta Middha Vs State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 312/2023

¶3

Shweta Middha D/o Shri Ramesh Middha W/o Shri Shubham Nagpal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Street No. 13, Ward No. 17, Near Kheterpal Mandir Kirpal Nagar, Setia Colony Sri Ganganagar (Raj.).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶7

The Director, Elementary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Bikaner.

¶8

The Joint Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner Zone, Bikaner.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Pareek

¶11

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶12

Order

¶13

09/01/2023

¶14

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to post the petitioner to a place where her husband, who is in Government service is posted.

¶15

Various submissions have been made in the writ petition including submission that it is the policy of the State Government to post the husband and wife at the same station and at the place, where the petitioner seeks transfer, there are vacant positions.

¶16

In view of the submissions, which have been made in the petition and the fact that the petitioner’s representation is already pending with the respondents, the present writ petition is disposed

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-312/2023]

¶19

of with a direction to the respondents to sympathetically consider the representation made by the petitioner based on the policy of the State Government.

¶20

The petitioner would be free to file a fresh representation along with the certified copy of the order instant. If such a fresh representation is made, the same would be considered by the respondents objectively and decided by a speaking order within a period of three weeks’ from the date a copy of this order along with writ petition/representation is placed before the respondents.

¶21

The stay application also stands disposed of.

¶22

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶23

190-Inder/-

Shweta Middha v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shweta Middha v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kueya Ram Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil Chandwani Vs the State of Rajasthan

Prem Chand Raiger Vs State of Rajasthan

Kheta Ram Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan

Anjali Jaiswal Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahendra Kumar Bhati Vs the State of Rajasthan