Jeeya Ram v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought a speaking order on his representation. The Court directed the respondents to decide the representation by a speaking order in strict accordance with law.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondents to decide petitioner's representation by passing a speaking order strictly in accordance with law.
What the court decided
[2023:RJ-JD:42243]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3854/2023
Jeeya Ram S/o Satya Narayan, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Chadi, Vpo Chadi, Tehsil Aau, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
- Union Of India, Through Ministry Of Defence, South Block, New Delhi, India.
- Directorate General Of Recruiting Authority, Military Containment, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
- Army Recruitment Officer, Army Recruitment Office, Near Bhati Chouraha, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
- Dhankar Basu, Col. Dir, Rtg, Aro, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Rajpurohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit, Dy.S.G.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jeeya Ram
- respondent
Union Of India
- respondent
Directorate General Of Recruiting Authority
- respondent
Army Recruitment Officer
- respondent
Dhankar Basu
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/3854/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court