Allowed

Payal v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Dec 2023CW/4488/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition seeking regularization of the petitioner's services. Relying on a prior coordinate bench decision, the Court directed the State Government to decide the matter and issue the necessary regularization order within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the State Government to decide the matter and issue the requisite regularization order within four weeks.

Payal Vs the State of Rajasthan — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:41885]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4488/2023

¶4

Payal D/o Mahaveer Prasad, Aged About 23 Years, Near Gaushala, Ward No.18 (New Ward No.06), Sangaria, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Local Self, Secretariat, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶8

1. The Director, Department Of Local Self, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶9

1. The Deputy Director (Regional), Department Of Local Self, Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶10

The Municipality, Sangaria, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan) Through Its Executive Officer.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Yogendra Singh for Mr. Trilok Joshi
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Rajesh Parihar,AGC

¶13

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶14

Order

¶15

04/12/2023

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is squarely covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1952/2019, decided on 06.07.2020, which in turn had relied on order in the case of Roshan Lal Saini v. State & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18056/2015, decided on 09.03.2017. In the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra), a coordinate Bench of this Court inter alia directed as under:

(2 of 2)

[2023:RJ-JD:41885]

[CW-4488/2023]

“In this view of the matter, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the State Govt. to decide the matter at the earliest to facilitate issuance of requisite order of regularization of petitioner’s services, strictly in accordance with law. The requisite exercise be undertaken by the State Govt. at the earliest, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date presentation of this order.”

¶21

Learned counsel for the respondents, is not in a position to dispute the fact that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra). 3. In view of the above fact situation, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of in light of and with similar directions as given in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra). All pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶22

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J

¶23

54-Sudheer/-

Payal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Payal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suman Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaidev Vs State and Ors.

Yugal Kishore Bakolia Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Dev Joshi Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganpat Lal Purohit Vs State and Ors.

Nandlal Bhati Vs State and Ors.