The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous upon the petitioner's counsel stating that an amicable settlement had been reached between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:18784]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3553/2019
Abdul Jabbar S/o Abdul Samad Khan, Aged About 62 Years, By Caste Musalman R/o Chatikana Khar Road, Karauli, Tehsil And Distt. Karauli.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Malkhan Chaturvedi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
23/08/2023
Counsel for the petitioner submits that both the parties have entered into the amicable settlement out of the Court and therefore, in view of the settlement between both the parties, the present writ petition has been infructuous.
In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
[2023:RJ-JP:18784]
[CW-3553/2019]
(2 of 2)
Since, the main petition has been dismissed, the pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Seema/237
Abdul Jabbar
Mangtu
Lohari
Munni
Nanni
Basiran
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
