The High Court at Jaipur dismissed the writ petition as infructuous based on the petitioner's counsel's submission, subsequently dismissing all pending applications.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; all pending applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 789/2020
Vinod Das Bairagi S/o Shri Sitaram Das Bairagi, Aged About 46 Years, By Caste Bairagi,r/o Siwad ,panchayat Samiti Choth Ka Barwara Tehsil Choth Ka Barwara, Sawaimadhopur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akshay Sharma Mr. Prem Shankar Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
22/08/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petitioner is dismissed as having become infructuous.
[CW-789/2020]
(2 of 2)
Since the main petition has been dismissed, stay application and all other pending application/s, if any, also stand dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Ritu/109
Vinod Das Bairagi
State Of Rajasthan
GANESH RAM MEENA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
