Disposed

Anjali Jaiswal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Jan 2023CW/161/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a petition by a nursing tutor claiming entitlement to an experience certificate and bonus marks. Citing Lalaram, the court directed respondents to consider the petitioner's rights as per law and precedent, allowing recourse if bonus marks are refused.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for experience certificate and bonus marks in accordance with the judgment in Lalaram and Savita Manmiya.

Anjali Jaiswal Vs State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 161/2023

¶3

Anjali Jaiswal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 168, Gandhi Nagar, Sector No. 1, Chittorgarh (Raj.).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶8

The Additional Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur.

¶9

The Joint Director, Medical And Health Services, Zone Udaipur, District Udaipur.

¶10

The Principal Medical Officer, General Hospital, Chittorgarh.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi with Mr. Jayram Saran
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. K. S. Rajpurohit, AAG assisted by
		Mr. Shreyansh Mehta

¶13

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶14

Order

¶15

09/01/2023

¶16

Mr. Bishnoi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not only entitled for issuance of experience certificate having worked as Nursing Tutor-cum-Clinical Instructor but also entitled for bonus marks as has been held by this Court in the case of Savita Manmiya Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors : SB Civil Writ Petition No.2835/2020 vide order dated 16.02.2021.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-161/2023]

¶19

Mr. Rajpurohit, learned Additional Advocate General on the other hand submitted that in light of the order dated 05.01.2023 passed by this Court in the case of Lalaram Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors : SB Civil Writ Petition No.19677/2022 so also the circular issued by the State Government, the petitioner is only entitled to experience certificate.

¶20

It is asserted that so far as petitioner’s claim for getting bonus marks is concerned, the same is premature, inasmuch as the competent authority has not yet decided petitioner’s right for getting bonus marks on the basis of experience certificate or in light of judgment of this Court in the case of Savita Manmiya (supra).

¶21

The writ petition is disposed of in light of the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Lalaram (supra) and the respondents are directed to consider petitioner’s right in accordance with law, including the judgment rendered in the case of Savita Manmiya (supra).

¶22

In case petitioner’s claim for bonus marks is refused, she shall be free to take appropriate legal remedy in accordance with law.

¶23

Stay application too stands disposed of accordingly.

¶24

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶25

178-A.Arora/-

Anjali Jaiswal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anjali Jaiswal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kueya Ram Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil Chandwani Vs the State of Rajasthan

Prem Chand Raiger Vs State of Rajasthan

Kheta Ram Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahendra Kumar Bhati Vs the State of Rajasthan

Shweta Middha Vs State of Rajasthan