The High Court made an interim stay on a transfer order absolute. It held that due to the passage of time and changed circumstances, the expediency for transfer had waned, and the order should not be given effect to.
The interim order staying the transfer order is made absolute; the impugned transfer order shall not be given effect to.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3039/2021
Smt. Gudiya Meena D/o Shri Ganpat Singh Meena W/o Shri Ramprasad Meena, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Kumbhalgarh, District Rajsamand Presently Posted As Village Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Kumbhalgarh, District Rajsamand (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Vyas
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
20/01/2023
(2 of 2) [CW-3039/2021]
and passage of sufficiently long time, the expediency must have withered away or ceased to exist by now.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
150-Zeeshan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an interim stay on a transfer order should be made absolute when administrative exigencies have ceased to exist due to passage of time.
Smt. Gudiya Meena
State Of Rajasthan
Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Rajsamand
Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Kumbhalgarh
Gram Panchayat Usar, Through Its Sarpanch
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
