Vijay v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the writ petition. Court dismissed the petition along with the stay petition upon the petitioner seeking liberty to raise issues with the bank.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as not pressed. Stay petition also dismissed.
What the court decided
[2023:RJ-JD:32598]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2034/2022
Vijay S/o Shri Laxmi Kant Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 55, Shiv Villa, Gandhi Nagar, Near Rto, Kalka Mata Road, Udaipur 313001.
----Petitioner
Versus
- State Of Rajasthan, Through District Magistrate, Udaipur. 2. Syndicate Bank After Merger Now Canara Bank, Through Its Authorised Officer, Branch Office 144, Tecnocrat Society, 100Ft Road, Badgau, Udaipur.
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) |
: Mr. Sumit Singhal. : |
|---|
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI Order
04/10/2023
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vijay S/o Shri Laxmi Kant Sharma
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan, Through District Magistrate, Udaipur
- respondent
Syndicate Bank After Merger Now Canara Bank, Through Its Authorised Officer
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/2034/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court