Disposed

Anjali Jha D/O Vishnu Kant Jha v. the Director, Elementary Education

Rajasthan HC11 Dec 2023CW/19572/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of writ petitions regarding appointment to Teacher Grade-III. Following a connected matter, the court directed respondents to refer specific questions to experts for re-examination within six weeks based on petitioner submissions. Pending applications stand dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to refer objectionable questions to experts for re-examination within six weeks and allow petitioner to submit representation within ten days.

Anjali Jha D/O Vishnu Kant Jha Vs the Director… — Education and Admissions | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JP:39002]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19572/2023

¶4

Anjali Jha D/o Vishnu Kant Jha, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 1745/30, Deep Chand Ka Bada Nagra, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 2108249).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

¶8

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶9

Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ram Pratap Saini
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Rajendra Soni, AAG with
	Ms. Nayan Tara Soni

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶13

Judgment / Order

¶14

11/12/2023

¶15

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court vide order dated 28.11.2023 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18767/2023

¶16

“Karishma & Ors. Vs. The Director of Primary Education,

¶17

Bikaner & Ors.” alongwith other connected matters.

¶18

In case of Karishma (supra) this Court has observed as

¶19

under:-

¶20

“8. In case of Raman Choudhary (supra) the Coordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur has observed as under:-

[2023:RJ-JP:39002]

[CW-19572/2023]

(2 of 3)

“In view of the discussions made above, the present writ petitions are disposed of with a directions to the respondents to refer the questions mentioned in these writ petitions to the experts appointed by them (other than those who had already finalized the objections to the preliminary answer key dated 18.03.2023). The expert body, while re-examining the matter, shall take into account the submissions made in the present writ petitions and thereafter pass appropriate orders with respect to the adjudication made by them on the objectionable questions raised in these writ petitions. The said exercise of examination by the expert body shall be completed within a period of four weeks from today and if the respondents find the report of the expert committee giving any change to the answers adjudicated by them in the final answer key, they will take the appropriate measures for revising the result.

¶25

Needless to say, if the petitioners come in the merit after revision of the result, appropriate action will be taken for processing their case for appointment.

¶26

It is also made clear that question Nos.3, 27 & 50 of the Master Question Paper need not be sent to the expert body for re-examination.”

¶27

In view of the above, this Court disposes off these writ petitions with liberty to the petitioners to submit the representation detailing out their specific objections as has been stated in the writ petitions, to the respondents within fifteen days from today. The respondents on receipt of the representation, shall refer the questions mentioned in the representation to the experts appointed by them (other than those who had already finalized the objections to the preliminary answer key dated 18.03.2023). The Expert Body, while re-examining the matter, shall take into account the averments made in the representation and thereafter, pass appropriate order in respect to the adjudication made by them on the objectionable questions raised in these writ petitions and submit before the respondents by filing the representation. The said exercise of examination by the Expert Body shall be completed within a period of six weeks from today and if the respondents find the report of the Expert Committee giving any change to the answers adjudicated by them in the final answer key, they will take the appropriate measures for revising the result.

[2023:RJ-JP:39002]

[CW-19572/2023]

(3 of 3)

Needless to say, if the petitioners come in the merit after revision of the result, appropriate action will be taken for processing their case for appointment.

¶32

It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the RSSB has already made recommendation to the State Government for giving appointment to the selected candidates on the post of Teacher Grade-III Level-II in various subjects. The respondentState shall make a mention in the appointment orders to be issued about the order of re-examination of the answer key and in case the result is revised and any person who has also been given appointment prior to the revision of the result, does not find place in the revised merit list, the appointment given to him before revised result will not create any right in his favour to continue.”

¶33

Considering the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed off in terms & conditions as given in case of Karishma (supra) with a modification that the petitioner may submit her representation within ten days from today.

¶34

Since the main petition has been disposed off, the stay application and all pending application/s, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶35

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶36

DIVYA SAINI /224

Anjali Jha D/O Vishnu Kant Jha v. the Director, Elementary Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anjali Jha D/O Vishnu Kant Jha v. the Director, Elementary Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramawatar Yadav S/O Shri Jugga Ram Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Sharma S/O Dr. Pankaj Kumar Sharma Vs the State of Rajasthan

Laxmi Naraian Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Rodi Lal Meena S/O Hakji Meena Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sanjay Jain S/O Shri Kanti Lal Jain Vs Shri Vardhman Balika Secondary School

Ramkishan Meena, S/O Shri Lalu Ram Meena Vs State of Rajasthan