Petitioner sought redress based on a standard of entitlement established in a related judgment (S.B. CWP No. 18330/2023). The Court disposed of the petition by mutual consent, granting liberty to file a fresh representation to the respondents.
Liberty granted to file fresh representation; respondents directed to do needful within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:43598]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19095/2023
Mafat Lal Joshi S/o Chaman Lal Joshi, Aged About 61 Years, Nimbaj, District Sirohi, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Pritam Joshi |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Durgaram Kawadia |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order
13/12/2023
Learned counsel for both sides are ad idem that the petitioner’s case is similar to the one in S.B. CWP No. 18330/2023 Gulab Singh Ranawat Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., wherein this Court issued directions to consider the respresentation of the petitioner in accordance with observations made in the said judgment.
[2023:RJ-JD:43598]
[CW-19095/2023]
(2 of 2)
Accordingly, by mutual consent, present writ petition is also disposed of in terms of the judgment in the case of Chandra Ram (supra). Petitioner is granted liberty to file fresh representation.
The respondents are directed to do the needful within a period of two months of receiving copy of the instant order. The respondents would, however, be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the representation and only in case, the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner would be entitiled to the relief.
(ARUN MONGA),J
255-divyaP/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of directions issued in a related writ petition to consider his representation?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gulab Singh Ranawat Vs. State of RajasthanReferred¶18
S.B. CWP No. 18330/2023 Gulab Singh Ranawat Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Mafat Lal Joshi
State Of Rajasthan
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
