Petitioner's counsel stated the writ petition was infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition accordingly and disposed of the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 176/2006
Sohan Lal Rajput son of Shri Tota Ram, resident of gopalgarh, district bharatpur
----Petitioner
Versus
1.The Principal Medical Officer, district bharatpur
2.Pappu @ Ashok son of shri teekam dass, resident of mohalla, gulal kund, mathura gate, bharatpur, district bharatpur 3.Estate officer and addl. District collector bharatpur
4.Additional district & Session Judge No.2, Bharatpur, District Bharatpur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bipin Gupta For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
17/08/2023
Counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
The pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Seema/173
Sohan Lal Rajput
The Principal Medical Officer, district bharatpur
Pappu @ Ashok
Estate officer and addl. District collector bharatpur
Additional district & Session Judge No.2, Bharatpur
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
