This order dismisses a writ petition as infructuous because the respondent counsel stated the petitioner had already received compensation, rendering no further legal determination necessary.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the payment of compensation to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1817/2021
Pradeep Kumar S/o Shri Chiranji Lal, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Dahar Ki Dhani, Tan Islampur, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu, (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akhil Simlote, Mr. Dikshant Jain, Mr. Ashvini Raj Tanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Raj Tantia
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
16/08/2023
Counsel for the respondents submits that this present writ petition has become infructuous, in view of the fact that the petitioner has already being paid the amount of compensation.
Counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to controvert the fact stated by the counsel for the respondent.
[CW-1817/2021]
(2 of 2)
In view of the statement made by counsel for the respondents, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
However, the petitioner would be at liberty to move an application for revival of this writ petition, in case, the statement made by counsel for the respondents is found incorrect.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Seema/137
Pradeep Kumar
Union Of India
Adani Transmission Limited
Bikaner Khetri Transmission Limited
District Collector Jhunjhunu
Sub. District Magistrate Chidawa
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
