This order dismisses the writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time. The High Court did not engage with the merits of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:33843]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16594/2011
----Petitioner
Versus
1.State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Ayurvedic Department, Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
K.C. Surela |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
S.N. Kumawat |
| Mr. | Sahir Hussain | |
| Mr. | M.F. Baig | |
| Mr. | Amit Lubhaya | |
| Mr. | Hari Kishan Saini |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order
07/11/2023
Counsel for the petitioners submits that by efflux of time, the present writ petition has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, the present writ petition stands dismissed, as having become infructuous.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Upendra Pratap Singh /257
Bhuvnesh Kumar Gothwal
Subhash Dharu
Mukesh Kumar Verma
State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan Public Service Commission
Inderjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
