Petitioners contended the writ petition was infructuous. The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the petition on that ground, leading to the dismissal of ancillary applications by operation of law.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; ancillary applications stayed or pending dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:15552]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 159/2013
----Petitioner
Versus
----Proforma Defendants- Non-Petitioners
[2023:RJ-JP:15552] (2 of 2) [CW-159/2013] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.K. Gupta For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
27/07/2023
Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Since the main petition has been dismissed, stay application and all other pending application/s, if any, also stand dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
ARTI SHARMA/7
Jahrudeen s/o Shri Ibrahim
Khalik Mohd
Sirajudeen S/o Shri Ibrahim
Addi District Judge (FT) Sawaimadhopur
Ismilee W./o Phool Mohd.
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
