Dismissed

Smt. Amandeep Brar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Sept 2023CW/1408/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of a writ petition regarding a grievance over a vacant post, directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation within two weeks for transfer to a nearby posting.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to submit fresh representation for nearby posting within two weeks. Authority to decide within six weeks clarity that direction not to grant relief.

Smt. Amandeep Brar Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:30575]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1408/2022

¶4

Smt. Amandeep Brar D/o Jagraj Singh Brar, W/o Shabjeet Singh, Aged About 30 Years, B/c Jat Sikh, Resident Of Vpo Dulmana, Tehsil Pilibangan Dist Hanumangarh (Raj) At Present Village Parasoli, Tahasil Amarpur Dist Ajmer (Raj)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of School Education, Shiksha Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur Rajasthan

¶9

Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner

¶10

Chief Executive Officer, Ajmer, Rajasthan

¶11

Chief Executive Officer, Churu, Rajasthan

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Vivek Sharma
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. PankajSharma,AAG

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶15

Order

¶16

19/09/2023

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if an appropriate direction is issued to the respondents to consider petitioner’s representation to be posted at a nearby place, in accordance with law, where concerned post is lying vacant.

¶18

The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to address a fresh representation before the competent authority pointing out vacant posts within a period

[2023:RJ-JD:30575]

[CW-1408/2022]

(2 of 2)

of two weeks alongwith photostat copy of the earlier representation and certified copy of the order instant.

¶23

In case, such representation is filed by the petitioner, the competent authority shall decide the same, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six weeks from the receipt thereof.

¶24

It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner’s grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.

¶25

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶26

The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case, the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner would be entitled to the relief.

¶27

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶28

306-Shahenshah/-

Smt. Amandeep Brar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Amandeep Brar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Goga Devi Vs State of Rajasthan

Aaved Hassan Vs the State of Rajasthan

Kana Ram Garg Vs State of Rajasthan

Ghamee Bishnoi Vs State of Rajasthan

Ujjawal Joshi Vs the State of Rajasthan

Maksud Khan Vs State of Rajasthan