The single judge dismissed two connected writ petitions challenging an appointment advertisement as infructuous, holding that the petitions had become so due to the passage of time, noting no appearance by the petitioners.
Writ petitions dismissed as having become infructuous by efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:33476]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1779/2008
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1356/2008
Mahesh Chand Sharma s/o Sh. Hari Shankar Sharma a/a 28 years r/o Plot No. A-25, Tatkaleshwarpuri Colony, Hida Ki Mori, Ramganj Bazar Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
(2 of 2)
[2023:RJ-JP:33476]
[CW-1779/2008]
Medical Health & Ayurveda, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
06/11/2023
None present on behalf of the petitioners, even in the second round.
By these writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the appointment advertisement dated 08.08.2007 issued by the respondents.
In my considered view, by efflux of time, these writ petitions have become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, these writ petitions stand dismissed, as having become infructuous.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Upendra Pratap Singh /153-154
1 issue framed by the court
Whether these writ petitions challenging an appointment advertisement have become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
Mukesh Kumar Barabar
Smt. Poonam
State Of Rajasthan
INDERJEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
