Single bench permitted the withdrawal of a writ petition. The court directed the petitioner to file a representation with a certified copy of the order for expedient consideration and dismissed the writ petition and stay application.
Writ petition and stay application dismissed; withdrawal permitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:31160]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12758/2023
Priyanka D/o Lt Shri Babulal Ji, Aged About 39 Years, By Caste Harizan, Resident Of Raj Bhawan, Juni Bagar, Kila Road, Jodhpur (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Prem |
Dayal Bohra |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Sunil |
Beniwal,AAG |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
21/09/2023
[2023:RJ-JD:31160]
[CW-12758/2023]
(2 of 2)
petitioner’s grievances in accordance with law including the judgment passed by Division Bench in the case of Virendra Kumar (supra).
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
69-Shahenshah/-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Virendra Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.Referred¶14
DB Special Appeal No.1733/2018 : Virendra Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.
Priyanka D/o Lt Shri Babulal Ji
State Of Rajasthan
Municipal Council Through Its Commissioner, Pali
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
