Disposed

Vikaram Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Jan 2023CW/10809/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur disposed of five connected writ petitions filed by liquor licensees against pending proceedings. The court acted on a coordinate bench's order granting a four-week response window and withdrawing proceedings, accepting the AAG's submission.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings treated as show cause notices; four-week response granted; attachment orders withdrawn; petitions disposed.

Vikaram Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶2

JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10801/2022

¶4

Suresh Kumar Mewara S/o Mohan Lal, Aged About 39 Years, 36, Vishnu Nagar, Naya Gaon, Pali (Raj.). Licensee Deshi Liquor Composite Shop G.p. Boosi

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance (Excise) Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

Commissioner, Excise Department, Udaipur.

¶9

District Excise Officer, Block Sumerpur, District Pali.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

Connected With

¶12

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10802/2022

¶13

Priyanka Modi D/o Vijay Kumar Modi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Suraj Villa, B-11, Roop Nagar, Jalore (Raj.). Liquor Shop Jalori Gate Se Aakhliya Choraha Shop No. 04, Jodhpur (West).

¶14

----Petitioner

¶15

Versus

¶16

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Finance (Excise) Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶17

Commissioner, Excise Department, Udaipur.

¶18

District Excise Officer, Jodhpur.

¶19

----Respondents

¶20

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10809/2022

¶21

Vikaram Singh S/o Shri Rajendra Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/ o Rajputo Ka Bas, Achina, Kheenvsar, Nagaur (Raj.). Liquor Shop From Bhadwasia Railway Chouraha To Ramsagar Crossroads Shop 1-1902035

¶22

----Petitioner

¶23

Versus

¶24

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Finance (Excise) Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶25

Commissioner, Excise Department, Udaipur.

¶26

District Excise Officer, Jodhpur.

¶27

----Respondents

¶28

(2 of 3)

¶29

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14326/2022

¶30

Uttam Singh S/o Shri Hari Singh, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Vaghela Vas, Lawara, Tehsil Ghanera, District Banaskantha (Gujarat). Deshi Liquor Shop Bhagli Singhlan.

¶31

----Petitioner

¶32

Versus

¶33

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Finance (Excise) Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶34

Commissioner, Excise Department, Udaipur. 3. District Excise Officer, Jalore. 4. Rajasthan State Beverages Corporation Ltd. (Rsbcl), Through Managing Director, Vitta Bhawan, (D-Block, Ist Floor), Janpath, Near Vidhan Sabha, Jaipur.

¶35

Rajasthan State Ganga Nagar Sugar Mill Limited, Head Office Jaipur, Through Managing Director, 4Th Floor, Nehru Shankar Bhavan, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶36

----Respondents

¶37

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12503/2022

¶38

Babu Lal S/o Shri Dungar Ram, Aged About 62 Years, Ward No. 14, Kalu Mata Mandir Ke Pass, Khatik Mohalla, Ganganagar (Raj.). Licensee Composite Shop 36 Np Nanuwala.

¶39

----Petitioner

¶40

Versus

¶41

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Finance (Excise) Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶42

Commissioner, Excise Department, Udaipur.

¶43

District Excise Officer, Block Raisinghnagar, Sriganganagar.

¶44

Rajasthan State Beverages Corporation Ltd. (Rsbcl), Through Managing Director, Vitta Bhawan, (D-Block, Ist Floor), Janpath, Near Vidhan Sabha, Jaipur.

¶45

Rajasthan State Ganga Nagar Sugar Mill Limited, Head Office Jaipur, Through Managing Director, 4Th Floor, Nehru Shankar Bhavan, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶46

----Respondents

¶47

(3 of 3)

¶48

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Hans RajKuldeep.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Sandeep Shah, Sr. Adv. cum AAG
	with Ms. Pratyushi Mehta.

¶49

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

¶50

Order

¶51

02/01/2023

¶52

Learned counsel for the petitioners has shown the order dated 08.09.2022 passed by a coordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Jaipur Bench in Mohanlal Jagdishbhai Gopaliya Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8677/2022 & other connected matters, which reads as follows:

¶53

“Learned Additional Advocate General, at the outset, submits that all the demand notices/orders impugned and under challenge in these writ petitions may be treated as show cause notices to the petitioners. He submits that the petitioners may file their response/reply/representation against these notices/orders within a period of four weeks from today whereupon, the respondents shall proceed in accordance with law. Learned AAG further submits that all consequential proceedings including attachment orders in pursuance of the demand notices/orders in the instant writ petitions shall stand withdrawn.

¶54

Learned counsels for the petitioners have no objection to the aforesaid submission and pray that the instant writ petitions may be disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶55

In view thereof, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of submission made by learned AAG. The pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly.”

¶56

The present petitions are disposed of in terms of the aforequoted order. All pending applications stand disposed of.

¶57

(ARUN BHANSALI),J

¶58

10, 11, 12, 15 & 19-sumer/-

Vikaram Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikaram Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashish Chaubey Vs State of Rajasthan

Parasmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Banshiram Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhagirath Mali Vs Ladulal

Priyanka Modi Vs State of Rajasthan

Suresh Kumar Mewara Vs State of Rajasthan