A single bench held a writ petition infructuous based on the petitioner's counsel's statement, dismissing the matter without addressing substantive legal questions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:22051-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1036/2023
Krishan Kumar S/o Shri Veerma Ram, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Village Rajbera, P.o Undu, District Barmer (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sameer Pareek For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order
18/07/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
93-Taruna/-
Krishan Kumar S/o Shri Veerma Ram
The Government Of India, Through Secretary, Ministry Of Social Justice And Empowerment
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Rajasthan Subordinate Services Selection Board
The Board Of Secondary Education, Ajmer
The Director, Directorate Of Education, Bikaner
The Department Of Personnel (Dop), Jaipur
VIJAY BISHNOI
YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
